Comments on: Stupid C++ vs C# performance comparison http://florent.clairambault.fr/stupid-cpp-vs-charp-performance-comparison?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=stupid-cpp-vs-charp-performance-comparison Wed, 28 Dec 2011 17:34:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19719 By: Florent Clairambault http://florent.clairambault.fr/stupid-cpp-vs-charp-performance-comparison/comment-page-1#comment-6669 Florent Clairambault Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:06:49 +0000 http://florent.clairambault.fr/?p=2409#comment-6669 Generics are much more than templates but at high level yes, it's very similar and at the low level, it's also very similar once JITed. Manually inlining can be quite hard. But take the case of a template, you can easily make a templated and inlined code in C++. Which means that a code that calls a method of the template could be translated to not doing a code but simply executing few instructions. In a similar situation in .Net, I don't know how it would be optimized. I guess it would worth doing an other stupid C++/C# comparaison test. Generics are much more than templates but at high level yes, it’s very similar and at the low level, it’s also very similar once JITed. Manually inlining can be quite hard.

But take the case of a template, you can easily make a templated and inlined code in C++. Which means that a code that calls a method of the template could be translated to not doing a code but simply executing few instructions. In a similar situation in .Net, I don’t know how it would be optimized. I guess it would worth doing an other stupid C++/C# comparaison test.

]]> By: hoodaticus http://florent.clairambault.fr/stupid-cpp-vs-charp-performance-comparison/comment-page-1#comment-6664 hoodaticus Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:18:15 +0000 http://florent.clairambault.fr/?p=2409#comment-6664 "there’s no such thing like Template and forced inlining in C#." Well, you can always manually inline... As for templates, generics are the C# version of C++ templates, though perhaps incomplete. Nice blog, btw! “there’s no such thing like Template and forced inlining in C#.”

Well, you can always manually inline…

As for templates, generics are the C# version of C++ templates, though perhaps incomplete.

Nice blog, btw!

]]>