<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Automatic error reporting in PHP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://florent.clairambault.fr/automatic-php-error-reporting/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://florent.clairambault.fr/automatic-php-error-reporting?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=automatic-php-error-reporting</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 17:34:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19719</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florent Clairambault</title>
		<link>http://florent.clairambault.fr/automatic-php-error-reporting/comment-page-1#comment-1601</link>
		<dc:creator>Florent Clairambault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 10:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://florent.clairambault.fr/?p=167#comment-1601</guid>
		<description>This post isn&#039;t about caching but error reporting. You be speaking about the WordPress APC caching post.

Anyway, caching in PHP is almost always a good choice because the language is very slow. Fetching is always better than generating. So, there&#039;s a pretty big chance this also applies to your website.
You can cache from database, from file, from memory (APC) and something a little bit between memory and database : memcached. The fastest (but not distributed) technique is APC caching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post isn&#8217;t about caching but error reporting. You be speaking about the WordPress APC caching post.</p>
<p>Anyway, caching in PHP is almost always a good choice because the language is very slow. Fetching is always better than generating. So, there&#8217;s a pretty big chance this also applies to your website.<br />
You can cache from database, from file, from memory (APC) and something a little bit between memory and database : memcached. The fastest (but not distributed) technique is APC caching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webhost-choice.com</title>
		<link>http://florent.clairambault.fr/automatic-php-error-reporting/comment-page-1#comment-1595</link>
		<dc:creator>webhost-choice.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 02:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://florent.clairambault.fr/?p=167#comment-1595</guid>
		<description>Very interesting code and benchmarking ... my website is fully PHP driven, if I also cache it like in your example, will it load faster? i did a quick read trough all of the content you have here... its quite a lot, but good :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting code and benchmarking &#8230; my website is fully PHP driven, if I also cache it like in your example, will it load faster? i did a quick read trough all of the content you have here&#8230; its quite a lot, but good <img src='http://florent.clairambault.fr/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/11 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 318/319 objects using disk: basic

Served from: florent.clairambault.fr @ 2012-02-08 12:55:44 -->
